Reconciling Conflicting Evidence Among the Malikis and Its Impact on Fiqh Texts: An Applied Usul Study

An Applied Usul Study

Abstract

Summary:

In This Study, I Dealt With The Topic Of Removing The Contradiction Between The Evidences O The Malikis And Its Impact On Jurisprudence Texts This Topic Is Of Great Importance, AS "B " Of The Topics That Combine The Sciences Of The Qur'an, Amu Sciences Of Hadith And The Principles Of Jurisprudence Study, I Have Explained The Term Inconsistency According To The Malikis. The Reasons For The Contradiction. The Conditions for me Contradiction, The Textual And Jurisprudential Evidence And The Authority Of Each Evidence. Agreement To Arrange The Ways To Raise The Contradiction?

In Order To Achieve This Study, The Descriptive, Analytical And Comparative Approach Was Followed, And The Study Concluded With Results That There Is No Contradiction Between Peremptory And Presumptive Evidence, Because Peremptory Evidence Is Presented. 'The Conflict Occurs Between The Presumptive Evidence, Whether The Presumptive Evidence Or The Definitive One, And It Occurs Between The definitive evidence among them if the evidence is presumptive.

Some Applications Have Been Developed From The Jurisprudence Chapters (The Skin Of The Dead After Tanning, The Prohibition of Combining Two Sisters And Witnessing In Marriage) To Find Out The Extent To Which The Malikis Agree To Their Approach To Removing The Contradiction.

And It Appeared Through The Study Of The Applications That The Malikis Adhered To Their Jurisprudential Opinions With All The Images And Faces That They Put In Removing The Contradiction Between The Evidence.